In my experience the people who are obsessed with the losing presidential candidate from 2016 are also obsessed with the losing presidential candidate from the 2020 election, and their reasons are dumb in both cases. Needs to be updated - it's no longer the last election, though you could tenuously link it because the losing candidate from the last election is the one who coined the phrase. I'm still obsessed with the losing presidential candidate from the last election for some dumb reason. Well the preview says it either no worky no more or I did it wrong. I have it on strict and knowledgeable authority, irrefutable in logic, legality, or morality, that one is REQUIRED to listen to points of view/opinions/alt-facts that they do not subscribe to or agree with. They're not very open to spirited debate. That sounds like an awfully good way to end up getting shot. One of those weird laws that just turns up because some legislator has a bee in their bonnet about somethingĭunno, but I've now got a hankering to visit a couple of local fundie churches and deliver lectures on evolution.
Ironically, in Melbourne AU there was (and may still be) a bylaw about men not wearing dresses that expose their shoulders. You only have to have the right to bare arms to be free. Why should the government be pushing their pants-wearing agenda on the public? Why should workers be fired for demanding to be pants-free? This isn't freedom. I mean, even Adam only wore a girdle of fig-leaves. Pants are clearly a government conspiracy to control the population, and are an infringement of our God-given rights. Additionally, there's significant evidence to show they can lead to a decrease in sperm-count, leading to fertility issues. The scientific evidence showing positive health outcomes is sketchy, and there's significant data to show that they can raise the body's core temperature, potentially leading to heat stress during hot days. Many front line health care workers do not believe in the vax and many have lost their jobs over it.Īs hard as it is to believe, I would likely lose my job if I showed up without a shirt every day. How fucking thin-skinned are you beta cucks that a single negative word in your ears must mean Stalinism has arrived? The headline alleges there were complaints. This isn't about fighting misinformation. But nevermind India Arie bringing up some odd cast from over a decade ago where he used the N word.įace the truth or not.
All those artists taking part in it, that's a campaign by all looks and appearances, too. You were all the ones talking about how Spotify was tanking, and celebrating that. It quite simply and bluntly has not been all that either widespread nor organized, and I never said it was. But, admittedly, I'm not even sure that counts as said allegation. Look at the title of the article heading this thread. If anyone here alleged either of those, Ars did. one artist raised an issue?ĭon't ignore the way what I said was altered before commenting on it. *an allegedly organized and widespread campaign because. (he asks rhetorically, because he knows the answer already) Why is it a campaign* from 'teh LeFT' to shut down mis-information?
If people don't follow that guidance, the blame is (allegedly) on Spotify. Will Rogan's audience actually listen to an advisory and then hunt down other COVID information? Yet it's not clear that anyone has effectively dealt with the issue of misinformation spread through podcasts, he added. Spotify has shown more transparency in the past few days about how it deals with questionable content, and the new policy is a good first step, John Wihbey, a Northeastern University professor and specialist in emerging technologies, told The Associated Press
0 kommentar(er)
